|
  
SMASH HITS, 12-25 DEC 1990
Are Stock Aitken Waterman Down The Dumper?!?
Interview: MIKE SOUTAR
"By this time last year," says Pete Waterman, "we'd put 38 or 39
records out and most of them had been hits. This year we've
only put out 11 records so that's a massive difference. It's
partly deliberate because we wanted to take it a bit easier -
both me and Matt (Aitken) have become dads this year and we've
been working flat out for five years - and as it turned out
Kylie didn't want to record early in the year and Jason went on
tour so we had nothing to do anyway, so ..." He pauses
momentarily to sip his coffee and perch forward a bit more on
his chair, "...we've been working at some new projects, we've
shaped a few things up, we've looked around for new artists. We
took a deep breath this year. We needed a break and the public
needed a break from us."
We are inside the "nerve centre" of the Hit Factory - the Stock
Aitken Waterman empire in South London - two narrow three-storey
buildings where the most successful producers in pop have
written, played on, produced and mixed hundreds of hits over the
past few years. As well as being a studio complex, it's where
PWL (Pete Waterman Ltd), the record company which Kylie and
Jason (amongst others) are signed to, is based.
Anyone who's ever been inside the Hit Factory will tell you it's
not as swanky as you'd expect. All through the building there
are model steam trains and pictures of old locomotives
(railway's are Pete Waterman's second obsession after pop), but
most of the available space is taken up with boxes of tapes and
records, magazines and bits and bobs of recording gear.
Even today, when there are no artists in to record anything, all
it's little offices and narrow corridors are buzzing with
activity. And Pete Waterman (43) and his colleagues Mike Stock
(39) and Matt Aitken (34) are assembled in a room next to the
main studio called the Waiting Room (where singers sit before
they go in to record their vocals) to do their first interview
with Smash Hits for three years ...
"Having hits with Sonia was difficult at the best of times"
Stock Aitken Waterman have been here since 1986, although
they've been together as a songwriting/producing team since 1984
when they were the toast of the Hi-NRG disco scene producing the
likes of Hazell Dean, Divine and Dead Or Alive.
Since then, of course, they've invented several huge pop names,
resurrected a few flagging careers and they've made a number of
highly successful charity records. In all they've chalked up
well over 100 hit records (a fact commemorated in their recent
compilation LP "Stock Aitken Waterman - A Ton of Hits" which, in
actual fact, boasts 81 S/A/W - produced singles). They are, in
short, an absolute phenomenon if ever there was.
So what happened this year? Critics have been rather keen to
point out that, actually, 1990 hasn't been such a fruitful 12
months for them. For the first time, it seems, they've had a
lot of flops: Kakko, a Japanese girl they produced, failed
miserably to get into the charts. Lonnie Gordon, after a Top
Three hit with "Happenin' All Over Again", neglected in fact to
"happen" at all again with her second single "Beyond Your
Wildest Dreams". Big Fun had a flop single which stopped short
of the "fun" 40. Sonia left them. Bananarama left them to work
with a trendy producer bloke called Youth. All the new acts
they'd tried to make famous with the Hitman Roadshows (people
like Johnnie O, Shooting Party and The Marines) didn't cut the
mustard in the charts. (... but SAW never made any records
with these three acts!-Jeremy) And to top it all, their most
successful act, Kylie, decided to go off and record four songs
for her album with other producers.
And then, in the middle of October, for the first time in three
years, there was a two week spell in which none of the Top 75
records were S/A/W produced - although they claimed at the time
that they actually had two trendy dance records in the Top 75
under false names (they decline to say which ones, however).
Everyone who had ever disliked them happily trumpeted that this
was the end of Pete Waterman and his crew. they were, it was
reported, down the dumper at last ...
So what on earth happened?
Pete: "With the Yell! single, their record company went bankrupt
the day the record came out, so there were no copies in the
shops. I also think in hindsight that the band did so much
damage to themselves last year in interviews and television that
I don't know whether they could have made it. They were a
problem."
What about Kakko?
Pete: "Kakko stiffed. Absolutely stiffed. We got it totally
wrong. We misjudged it. It was our fault. She couldn't sing
the song we gave her."
And Lonnie Gordon's second record?
Pete: "Well that got caught between two stools. We made a
record which is out now which should have been out last April.
The Lonnie Gordon record was a great song, she sang it well, but
it was a ballad and ballads just don't do well that time of
year."
Have you split up with Sonia? Is it true you won't be working
with her again?
Pete: "Yes. We haven't fallen out but her views - or her
advisers' views - and ours don't meet. I don't care what people
say, but we're not in this for the money. We aim at having hit
records because that's what we love to do and having hit records
with Sonia was difficult at the best of times because of what
Sonia is. And what she is is a very bright bubbly little
character from Liverpool who is very easy to take the mickey out
of."
So how did you come to the decision to part company with her?
"The thing about Big Fun was we were only going to make one record with them"
Pete: "Because it got the point where she was losing this
company a lot of money. It was costing us a lot of money to
keep Sonia going. And when Sonia came and asked for a rather
large amount of money to buy a house for her parents and I got
the accountants to actually look at the accounts, this company
was in a hole a long way. So we had to say "Sonia, we love you
but you'll have to go elsewhere for this money because we'll pay
you what is in the pipeline, but if we start making another
album with you we're going to be over 200,000 pounds in debt and
we can't do that.""
What about Big Fun? Will you work with them again?
Mike: "According to the latest gossip, they've dumped us."
Pete: "According to the latest gossip I've got, their record
company has just dumped them."
Mike: "The thing about Big Fun was we were only going to make
one record with them. They needed a hit and so we did "Blame It
On The Boogie" and it was a hit and they said "Oh can we have a
follow-up please?" so you feel obliged to."
"I don't know what the future is for Kylie. She's doing her own thing"
Were you happy about the fact that Kylie went off to work with
other producers as well as you?
Pete: "Kylie came to me personally and said she wanted to write
songs and she wanted to write with Matt and Mike and I said
"That's not possible" because we work as a unit, the three of
us and whenever we've tried to write with other people it hasn't
worked. So I said to Kylie, "We can't do that, you'll have to
do it with someone else". We had total knowledge of the whole
thing and didn't have a problem with it."
Mike: "The thing is, having had such a massive success Kylie is
hardly likely to want to retain just one aspect of the recording
process - just coming in and singing - it's probable that she'll
want to do it all very soon and we won't be involved
anymore."
Pete: "And also she's got a boyfriend in the industry who's
probably spurring her on. So I think it's something we expect
to happen. I don't know what the future is for Kylie. She's
doing her own thing."
Mike: "It's fair to say, though, that this isn't the sort of
direction in which we'd want to take her."
"Jason would really like to stand up there with a guitar, greasy hair, jeans ..."
What do you think the next step for Jason is?
Mike: "He's in the same sort of boat as Kylie. He perceives
himself in an entirely different way from the way we do. Jason
I think is more into rock 'n' roll. He's Australian, he likes
INXS and Midnight Oil. He'd really like to stand up there with
a guitar, greasy hair, jeans ... we only ever saw him as a
nicely dressed, clean-cut pop star who happened to come from
Australia."
So you think it annoys him that Craig McLachlan has a band and
he doesn't?
Pete: "Yeah, definitely. I think that's exactly it. He'd love
that."
What Pete Waterman says, and he has a point here, is that having
a go at S/A/W for having a few flop records is rather like
saying Liverpool football club are down the pan because they've
not won every single game they've played this season. "They're
the best team there is!" he splutters. "They're eight points
ahead of the rest! The only news story is when they don't win!
It's like us when we have a flop."
But at least you're fantastically rich, eh?
Pete: "Nobody gets fantastically rich off pop records. That's a
myth. We're on a 4% royalty for every record sold what we
produce, split up that's 1 and 1/3 % each off the profit of
every record."
But don't you charge pop artistes a handsome price for producing
their records and making them famous?
Matt: "We could say to someone, "OK, we'll do your record for
50,000 pounds" and that way we would be very rich in a very
short time. But we actually only ever charge 500 pounds for
every single we produce."
But what Stock Aitken Waterman are clearly bothered about is
having hits. It's what they bring the conversation back to all
the time - getting to the "bullseye", as Pete Waterman calls
having a Number One hit. For most of next year, they say,
they'll be working with entirely new acts who no one has heard
of yet. There's a band called Delage, apparently, and another
one called Boy Crazy, but they will not be drawn further than to
say that the records they have planned are "totally different to
anything we've done before".
"We're going to start again," says Pete Waterman finally. "This
year we've has lots of people who we've worked with for a while
but now they're no longer with us. 1991 is going to be much
more challenging but we're still excited, we still want to make
hit records. I shouldn't start saying we're down the pan yet if
I was you ..."

|